Soil Mechanics / Stress paths, drainage and loading
Representing a stress state
The Mohr circle, the s–t and p–q invariants, and the total–effective split.
Lesson review: expert verification remains open
This lesson has received a full-context editorial review and a check of its technical explanations. Selected arithmetic has been checked separately. This is not independent engineering sign-off.
Corrections checked in this pass
- Constrained the principal-stress inputs and used equal stress-axis scales with clipped envelopes.
Checks needed for project use
- A geotechnical reviewer must check laboratory interpretation, classification conventions and the limits of drained, undrained and one-dimensional idealisations.
- Compressive drained/undrained convention assumed; tensile or extension-state interpretation is outside this lab.
These are educational models and exercises. Check their assumptions before using the results. The full technical content and every diagram have not yet been independently verified.
Concrete and steel calculations retain their stated first-generation Eurocode teaching basis. Use the standards and amendments specified for your project; do not mix generations without an appropriate design basis.
Read the lesson register and outstanding review notesWhy this matters
A soil element rarely fails the instant a load arrives — it is carried there along a path of changing stress. To follow that path we first need a compact way to represent a stress state as a single point, so that loading traces a line we can plot against the failure line. That is what the stress invariants give us.
What you should already know
- Effective stress σ′ = σ − u (Module 8)
- Principal stresses and the idea of shear on a plane
- The Mohr circle (met again here for soil)
A two-dimensional stress state is captured by the two principal stresses and , and drawn as a Mohr circle with:
- centre — a measure of the mean (normal) stress, and
- radius — a measure of the shear (deviatoric) stress.
Instead of drawing the whole circle every time, we can represent the state by the single point $(s, t)$ — its top. As the load changes, that point moves, and its track is the stress path.
What it calculates: compact mean and deviatoric measures of a stress state
- mean-stress measures (circle centre; triaxial mean) (kPa)
- deviatoric-stress measures (circle radius; deviator) (kPa)
In plain terms: The s–t pair matches the Mohr circle directly; the p–q pair is standard for triaxial work. Both split a stress state into a mean part and a shearing part — the split that matters for soil.
Every invariant comes in a total and an effective version. Because effective stress subtracts the porewater pressure equally from every normal stress, and . The mean measures shift by ; the deviatoric measures do not — as the next lesson derives. So the total and effective points sit at the same height on a stress-path plot, offset horizontally by the pore pressure.
Try it
Total and effective Mohr circle
The pore pressure slides the effective circle left of the total circle by exactly u. Watch it approach the failure line.
- Total s, t
- 140, 60 kPa
- Effective s′, t′
- 100, 60 kPa
- Cambridge p, q
- 120, 120 kPa
- Gap TSP→ESP = u
- 40 kPa
The effective circle is touching the failure line — the soil is at (or past) failure. Reduce the pore pressure or the deviator stress.
Worked example
Total and effective invariants of a stress state
Given
- Total principal stresses σ1 = 200 kPa, σ3 = 80 kPa
- Pore pressure u = 40 kPa
Find
The s–t and p–q invariants in both total and effective stress.
Assumptions
- Saturated soil; effective stress σ′ = σ − u applies to both principal stresses.
Summary
- A stress state is a Mohr circle: centre s = (σ1+σ3)/2, radius t = (σ1−σ3)/2.
- s–t (MIT) and p–q (Cambridge) invariants split stress into mean and deviatoric parts.
- Deviatoric measures (t, q) are the same in total and effective stress; mean measures (s, p) differ by u.
- The effective stress point is the total point shifted left by the pore pressure.